Cambridge Healthtech Institute's 16th Annual

Immunogenicity Assessment and Management

Tools for Assessing Risks and Mitigating Toxicity

May 14 - 15, 2024 ALL TIMES EST

As biologics continue to develop, cooperation between clinicians and assay developers when considering immunogenicity is essential. In addition, understanding and controlling immunogenicity-related risks are critical in the development of biotherapeutics to ensure they meet regulatory requirements. Cambridge Healthtech Institute’s 16th annual conference on Immunogenicity Assessment and Management brings together leading industry, regulatory, and academic experts to share best practices in immunogenicity assessment and management of both traditional biologics and novel therapeutics.

Sunday, May 12

Main Conference Registration1:00 pm

Recommended Pre-Conference Short Course2:00 pm

SC5: Targeting Solid Tumors and Understanding the TME

*Separate registration required. See short course page for details.

Tuesday, May 14

IMMUNOGENICITY ASSESSMENT AND HARMONIZATION

2:55 pm

Chairperson's Remarks

Klaudia Kuranda, PhD, Head of Immunology, Spark Therapeutics, Inc.

3:00 pm

Harmonization and Standardization of In Vitro Immunogenicity Assays

Sofie Pattijn, Founder & CTO, ImmunXperts, a Q2 Solutions Company

3:30 pm

Clinical Case Studies of Different ADA Testing Strategies—What Do We Gain with 3 Tiers of Assessment?

Mu Chen, PhD, Principal Scientist, Bioanalytical Strategy Group, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

The conservative, resource-intensive 3-tiered ADA testing strategy is under scrutiny for immunogenicity monitoring after two decades of use. A retrospective analysis of clinical ADA data from a mAb therapeutic using 1-tiered ADA testing strategy with a 1% false-positive cut point showed very similar results to the 3-tiered approach. This simplified strategy for ADA assessment could speed up data delivery and reduce resources for clinical program development without compromising patient safety.

4:00 pm Immunogenicity assessment and Ankyrons: Target binding reagents beyond antibodies

Andrew Isidoridy, PhD, Immunology Sales Specialist, ProImmune

Immunogenicity risk assessment is critical to winning in today’s drug market. Learn from real-world case studies applying MAPPS, T cell proliferation, MHC-peptide binding and cytokine release assays.

Ankyrons are next generation recombinant animal-free monoclonal binding reagents 10x smaller than antibodies with demonstrated success in a wide range of applications.  Learn how these high affinity tools can be used to interrogate target proteins providing solutions to problems that were previously not addressable. 

Refreshment Break in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing4:30 pm

5:10 pm

Neutralizing ADA Sample Testing and Report Harmonization

Michele Gunsior, PhD, Senior Director, Astria Therapeutics

Assessment of anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (NAb) is an important factor in contextualizing clinical study data. Recent guidance in incorporating immunogenicity information into drug product labeling underscores the need for consistency and scientific rigor to facilitate proper communication and understanding immunogenicity impact. To support this effort, a cross-industry group established harmonized recommendations and a report template for clearly summarizing the essential aspects of NAb clinical study testing and reporting. This talk will present the recommendations for NAb bioanalytical report elements such as the method, critical reagents, equipment, data analysis, and study results.

Close of Day6:10 pm

Dinner Short Course Registration6:10 pm

Wednesday, May 15

Registration and Morning Coffee8:00 am

CHARACTERIZATION STRATEGIES FOR NOVEL MODALITIES

8:25 am

Chairperson's Remarks

Jaya Goyal, PhD, Corporate Vice President, Head, Rare Disease Research, Novo Nordisk

Pallavi Lonkar, PhD, Vice President, Bioanalytical, Biomarkers, and DMPK, PepGen

8:30 am

Challenges Due to Pre-existing Antibodies in AAV Gene Therapy

Renuka Pillutla, PhD, Senior Vice President, Head, Development Sciences, Spark Therapeutics Inc

The presence of pre-existing antibodies to AAV presents a challenge in the development of systemically-delivered gene therapies. These antibodies can have a potential impact on transduction of target cells leading to reduced efficacy.  Therefore, pre-screening for anti-AAV antibodies in patients is a critical step in clinical development of AAV-based gene therapy. This presentation will discuss the technical and regulatory considerations in the development of phase-appropriate assays that can identify the right patients for the therapy. Critical activities towards co-development of a companion diagnostic that must parallel path drug development will be discussed.

9:00 am

Considerations for Immunogenicity Assessment of Oligonucleotide-based Therapeutics

Susovan Mohapatra, PhD, Director, DMPK, Stoke Therapeutics

Chemically modified Oligonucleotide therapeutics (ONT) have made tremendous progress in last two decades to address diseases that have been challenging to treat with small molecules or biologics. This talk will focus on factors to be considered for successful anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay development for supporting ONT based programs. A case study for development and validation of ELISA assays in monkey and human serum that meet the current regulatory guidelines for detection of ADA for STK-001, an antisense oligonucleotide in clinical development for treatment of Dravet Syndrome, will be described. Differences in the immunogenicity assays for supporting GLP toxicity studies and clinical studies, will be highlighted. Recommendations will be made for developing strategies for immunogenicity assessment for ONTs based on the available immunogenicity data for approved ONTs and regulatory expectations.

9:30 am

A Single Point Mutation on FLT3L-Fc Protein Increases the Risk of Immunogenicity

Yinyin Li, PhD, Principal Scientist, Biochemical & Cellular Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc.

This study contains a case of immunogenicity risk assessment for FLT3L-Fc variants. We utilized various risk assessment methods that include in-silico prediction, dendritic cell loading, MHC-associated peptide proteomics, in-vitro HLA peptide binding, and in-vitro T cell proliferation and ELISpot assays. The results indicated that a single point mutation found on the FLT3L-Fc has the potential to introduce immunogenic T cell epitopes carrying a high immunogenic risk. Furthermore, our analysis of HLA genotyping suggests that certain HLA-DR alleles are highly associated with immunogenic response.

10:00 am Identification of Anti-Idiotype Antibodies using Digital SPR

Benjamin Hoffstrom, PhD, Assistant Adjunct Professor, Medicine, UCLA

Anti-idiotypic antibodies (anti-IDs) are used in bioanalytical assays to monitor pharmacokinetics (PK) and the immunogenicity of therapeutic antibodies. Traditional anti-IDs discovery workflows can be labor and reagent intensive, limiting the number of candidates that can be investigated. This study aims to streamline the discovery of anti-IDs by combining digital surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and high throughput flow cytometry to efficiently screen thousands of anti-ID candidates and ultimately identify high-performance pairs.

Coffee Break in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing10:30 am

LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT AND CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT

11:10 am

Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics When Administered Intravenously vs. Subcutaneously

Kamalika Mukherjee, PhD, Principal Scientist, Bioanalytical Strategy, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc

Subcutaneous delivery of therapeutic proteins can increase patient compliance and reduce burden on healthcare systems compared to intravenous infusion. However, subcutaneous administration has been proposed to increase immunogenicity. We reviewed anti-drug antibody (ADA) data for numerous biotherapeutics that were administered both intravenously and subcutaneously, and overall, no difference in immunogenicity incidence was observed. Although route of administration may in some instances influence ADA, other risk factors are likely more impactful.

11:40 am

Immunogenicity and Hypersensitivity Assessment through Clinical Development

Karen Robbins, MD, Safety Physician and Clinical Lead, Immune Safety Knowledge Group, Patient Safety Oncology and Center of Excellence, AstraZeneca

Through development of an immune-specific consultation group, we present a model of risk assessment and focused clinical feedback to guide product teams through all phases of development and post-marketing. This model presents a novel and streamlined approach to addressing common concerns and unique issues throughout a global organization.

Session Break12:10 pm

12:20 pmEnjoy Lunch on Your Own

Session Break1:20 pm

INTERACTIVE DISCUSSIONS

1:30 pmFind Your Table and Meet Your Discussion Moderator
1:40 pmInteractive Discussions

Interactive Breakout Discussions are informal, moderated discussions, allowing participants to exchange ideas and experiences and develop future collaborations around a focused topic. Each discussion will be led by a facilitator who keeps the discussion on track and the group engaged. To get the most out of this format, please come prepared to share examples from your work, be a part of a collective, problem-solving session, and participate in active idea sharing. Please visit the Interactive Breakout Discussions page on the conference website for a complete listing of topics and descriptions.

IMMUNOGENICITY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT

2:25 pm

Chairperson's Remarks

Jack A. Ragheb, MD, PhD, Senior Vice President, Translational Sciences and Medicine, NexImmune

2:30 pm

Anti-Drug Antibodies: From von Behring to Today

Jack A. Ragheb, MD, PhD, Senior Vice President, Translational Sciences and Medicine, NexImmune

The original recognition of ADA and immune complex disease, the evolution of ADA responses, their continued impact on both clinical and preclinical studies, as well as novel ways to mitigate their formation will be examined.

3:00 pm

Pre-Clinical Immunogenicity Risk Assessment Strategy for Diverse Biological Modalities: Lead Selection and Mitigation

Jochem Gokemeijer, PhD, Senior Director, Molecular Discovery Technologies, Bristol-Myers Squibb

Immunogenicity of biotherapeutics has the potential to negatively affect efficacy and patient safety. Identifying immunogenicity liabilities early in the discovery process of new therapeutic leads allows for the selection of alternative leads or protein engineering to mitigate these liabilities. Increased complexity of biotherapeutics (TCEs, ADCs, bispecific mAbs, engineered cytokines) can pose some unique challenges and can require modifications of the immunogenicity liabilities assessment strategy. Here we will discuss our discovery strategy to select and develop new biotherapeutics with minimized immunogenicity liabilities.

3:30 pm

Antigen-Specific Immune Tolerance as a Strategy to Mitigate Immunogenicity of Biologic Therapies

Kei Kishimoto, PhD, Consultant, Former CSO, Selecta Biosciences, Inc.

The development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) is a common cause for treatment failure and adverse events associated with biologic therapies. Here I will describe the development of ImmTOR tolerogenic nanoparticles to induce antigen-specific regulatory T cells. ImmTOR has been applied preclinically to mitigate ADAs against a wide range of immunogenic biologics, including adalimumab, coagulation factor VIII, enzyme replacement therapy, bacterial immunotoxin, and viral gene therapy vectors—and clinically to a fungal-derived uricase enzyme therapy for refractory gout, culminating in successful completion of Phase 3 clinical trials. I will further discuss some of the challenges and lessons learned from this experience.

4:00 pm

Using Liquid Biopsy Proteomics to Decipher Immune Responses in the Eye

Vinit B Mahajan, MD, PhD, Professor, Ophthalmology, Vice Chair, Research, Stanford University

Molecular therapeutic testing for eye disease is a major biomedical and pharmaceutical focus, but immune mechanisms that limit outcomes remains a challenge. Liquid biopsy proteomics can be used in living humans to identify specific immune pathways active in individuals to optimize human clinical trials in gene and molecular therapies.

Ice Cream Break in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing4:30 pm

SPEED NETWORKING

4:40 pm

SPEED NETWORKING: How Many New Contacts Can You Make?

Mary Ann Brown, Executive Director, Conferences, Cambridge Healthtech Institute

Christina Lingham, Executive Director, Conferences and Fellow, Cambridge Healthtech Institute

Bring yourself and your business cards or e-cards, and be prepared to share and summarize the key elements of your research in a minute. PEGS-Boston will provide a location, timer, and fellow attendees to facilitate the introductions.

5:10 pm

Case Study Applying Patient-Centric Sampling to Immunogenicity Assessments

Joleen White, PhD, Head of Bioassays, Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute

Patient-centric sampling aims to improve the patient experience in clinical trials while maintaining quality assessments. In this case study, the application of capillary blood microsampling for immunogenicity aims to reduce the sampling burden for infants by decreasing volume and using a less invasive sampling technique. Assay development and validation will be presented alongside practical tips and clinical concordance.

5:40 pm

New in silico Immunogenicity Profiling Approach—Based on Drug/Pathogen Analogy

Michael Gutknecht, PhD, Principal Scientist II, Novartis Pharma AG

We developed a new in silico immunogenicity profiling method with which we could show that biotherapeutic sequences can bear analogues to pathogen sequences. This may result in a high number of memory T cells that are cross-specific to the biotherapeutic and may result in unwanted immunogenicity in a large proportion of the patient population. This new method can be utilized in de-immunization approaches in early biotherapeutic development.

Cheers to 20 Years Reception in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing6:10 pm

MENTORING MEET UP

7:15 pm

Creating and Fostering a Productive and Effective Mentor-Mentee Relationship

Carter A. Mitchell, PhD, CSO, Purification & Expression, Kemp Proteins, LLC

Deborah Moore-Lai, PhD, Vice President, Protein Development Platform, Abcam

This meet-up is designed for senior scientists that are interested in becoming a mentor for junior scientists: IN-PERSON ONLY

Over casual conversation, we will discuss:

  • What it takes to be a mentor
  • Finding the right match
  • Establishing safety and confidentiality
  • Time commitment/frequency of meetings
  • Remote vs in-person

Close of Immunogenicity Assessment and Management Conference7:30 pm






Register Now

View By:

Premier Sponsors

FairJourneyBiologics GenScript-CRO Integral-Molecular_NEW  OmniAbUnchainedLabs